Showing posts with label taliban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taliban. Show all posts

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Karzai praises Obama on engaging Taliban

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai on Sunday hailed President Barack Obama's call for engaging the Taliban.

"It is very good news that the American president, his Excellency Obama, has backed talks with those Taliban that he termed as moderate," Karzai said at an International Women's Day event in Kabul.

"This is the Afghan government's long stand. We wanted this and we support and stand with them to bring peace and stability to this land. Only those who have left their homes and are fighting their country because they are forced to, or are scared (of being arrested) or for other reasons, they are welcome (to join talks)."

Many analysts feel that a purely military solution in Afghanistan is no longer tenable as the Taliban has been growing in strength across most of the country.


Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, has requested that national elections, which were due to take place in August, be brought forward to April so as to be in line with the constitution. Inside Story asks: Is Karzai respecting the constitutional deadline, as his supporters claim, or is he attempting to gain an unfair advantage, as his opponents suggest? (Al-Jazeera)


Karzai hails US call for engaging Taliban

PRESS TV - ‎43 minutes ago‎
Afghanistan's president has welcomed the new US administration's readiness to engage 'moderate elements' of the Taliban in peace talks.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Obama and Afghanistan

A number of commentaries have been published recently exploring President Barack Obama's strategy in Afghanistan.

During the election, Obama promised to withdraw troops, except a non-combat residual force, from Iraq, but increase the U.S. presence in Afghanistan. He saw the mountainous country as the central front against terrorism and vowed to tackle al-Qaeda, which operates both in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It is less clear whether Obama is intent on stamping out the Taliban or is open to negotiations with that fundamentalist group.

Most of the opinion pieces question whether a "surge" would work in Afghanistan or whether the U.S. might be heading into another Vietnam-like quagmire.

The steady growth and expansion of the Taliban in recent years is well-documented. They now control much of the rural countryside in the eastern and southern parts of the country, and they are closing in on the capital Kabul. It is mainly in the northern areas, where the old "Northern Alliance" was based, and Kabul that U.S. and NATO forces can find any friends in the country.

Taliban forces are holed up in rugged mountain strongholds that are extremely difficult to operate in. Even small areas in this region can only be secured with large numbers of forces, and consequently many supply and communication routes are vulnerable to attackers.

NATO forces also appear to be losing the battle for the hearts and minds of the people. The Taliban, at least, appears to have little trouble finding new recruits even though they have adopted suicide tactics similar to those used by al-Qaeda.

Obama reportedly plans to increase troop strength in Afghanistan by about 30,000 with a lot of the concentration in the Taliban heartland of Kandahar. He also plans to use more private security companies to guard bases and transporation routes. The Kandahar bases is under rapid expansion to host an extra 10,000 U.S. troops.

Pakistan is often mentioned in the same breath as Afghanistan whenever the war is discussed by the new administration officials. Obama has hinted that he will place more pressure on Islamabad to exterminate insurgents in their mists, and that he will take unilateral action in certain instances.




Sky News

Obama's War Fearing Another Quagmire in Afghanistan
New York Times, United States - 16 hours ago
By HELENE COOPER WASHINGTON — Can President Obama succeed in that long-lamented “graveyard of empires” — a place that has crushed foreign occupiers for more ...
President Obama revs up Afghan fight; backseats Iraq at Clinton debut New York Daily News
Obama's Vietnam? Washington Times
Obstacles are many for US in Afghanistan Kansas City Star

Friday, January 23, 2009

Pakistan air strikes underscore continuation of Bush policy

President Barack Obama launched his first air strikes into Pakistan indicating that he will continue the Bush policy of unilateral military action against the spoken will of the Pakistani government.

This is the first action since Obama took office on Tuesday that is likely to attract some opposition from progressive groups that supported him strongly during the campaign. Vanity Fair has this to say:

Obama can't be expected to pander to liberals for the next four years. But the decision to double down in Afghanistan carries considerable risk. Like the economy, it is a huge problem. But even the economy can be expected to bounce back sometime in the next few years. If Afghanistan turns into Obama's Iraq, he may miss the support of the anti-war left, which, it's worth remembering, helped propel him past Hillary Clinton not so very long ago.

Los Angeles Times

Strikes in Pakistan Underscore Obama’s Options
New York Times, United States - 1 hour ago
Even as the CIA continues its strikes just inside Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan, Mr. Obama and his top national security aides are likely to review in ...
Suspected US missile attacks kill 18 in Pakistan Los Angeles Times
Suspected US Missile Strikes Kill at Least 20 in Pakistan Washington Post
Deadly missiles strike PakistanBBC News




WELT ONLINE

ANALYSIS: Obama, Pakistan and Afghanistan —Najmuddin A Shaikh
Daily Times, Pakistan - Jan 22, 2009
The “hard earned peace” that Obama is seeking in Afghanistan (and Pakistan, since for some time now the American security establishment and many who are now ...
Video: Obama, Clinton At State Dept. CBS


Afghan, Pakistani Officials Welcome Broader Strategy From US ... Voice of America

Obama names Mideast, South Asia envoys Los Angeles Times

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Mumbai attacks: Preemptive strike against Obama?

A new theory suggests that the Mumbai attacks were focused on neutralizing President-elect Barack Obama's strategy in the region.

“There’s a lot of clamour for action against Pakistan from India,” Pratap Bhanu Mehta, the head of the Centre for Policy Research. “This attack was not just an attempt to scuttle India’s peace process with Pakistan. It was in many ways a pre-emptive strike against [Barack] Obama’s strategy for the region.”

Obama had promised to focus US efforts on the tribal regions that border Afghanistan and Pakistan, including pressuring Islamabad to step up pressure against al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives working in the area.

However, ifPakistan diverts its forces to the border with India in fear of possible reprisal for the Mumbai attacks, Washington will have to tread more carefully in the region.


Vancouver Sun

Mumbai attacks ‘were a ploy to wreck Obama plan to isolate al-Qaeda’
Times Online - 4 hours ago
Relations between India and Pakistan were on a knife edge last night amid fears that Delhi’s response to the Mumbai attacks could undermine the Pakistani army’s campaign against Islamic militants on the frontier with Afghanistan.
The Region: India and Israel: The parallels Jerusalem Post
Pak shifts from Afghanistan to India PRESS TV



TopNews

Obama: Mumbai attacks will not defeat India's democracy
Jerusalem Post, Israel - Nov 28, 2008
Obama was monitoring the situation in Mumbai, where more than 150 people were killed in violence that began Wednesday night when gunmen attacked 10 sites ...
Investigation Begins as Assault in Mumbai Ends Washington Post
Obama sends condolences to Indian PM for Mumbai attacks victims Xinhua
A message to Obama? Ynetnews

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Karzai, Obama discuss Afghanistan security

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai spoke with US President-elect Barack Obama on Sunday for the first time. The two discussed the security situation in Afghanistan.

During the campaign, Obama promised to reinforce the US presence in Afghanistan by at least one brigade or about 4,000 troops. Karzai has publicly requested that Obama send 20,000 more troops to the country. Insurgent attacks in Afghanistan are up 30 percent from 2007.



Canada.com

Obama, Karzai Discuss Afghan Security
Voice of America - 10 hours ago
By VOA News Afghan President Hamid Karzai says he has spoken with US President-elect Barack Obama for the first time since Mr. Obama won the US election.
Obama committed to Afghanistan, says Karzai's office AFP
Obama tells Karzai Afghan security will be priority Reuters
US defense chief: More forces for Afghanistan vote The Associated Press




A Taliban attack on a supply convoy.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Barack Obama meets with Afghan President Karzai

Afghan President Hamid Karzai (left) walks with US Democratic Presidential contender Barack Obama in Kabul. Obama met with Afghan Karzai, who has been criticised by the Illinois senator for not doing enough to rebuild his war-torn country.(AFP/HO/Ho)
AFP/HO Photo: Afghan President Hamid Karzai (left) walks with US Democratic Presidential contender Barack Obama in Kabul. Obama met with Afghan Karzai, who has been criticised by the Illinois senator for not doing enough to rebuild his war-torn country.(AFP/HO/Ho)

Sen. Barack Obama met today with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai in Kabul as he continues his overseas tour.

In a joint statement, Obama together with Sens. Chuck Hagel and Jack Reed said: ""Our message to the Afghan government is this: We want a strong partnership based on 'more for more' — more resources from the United States and NATO, and more action from the Afghan government to improve the lives of the Afghan people. We need a sense of urgency and determination."

Fighting has escalated in Afghanistan as the Taliban and al-Qaeda continue to regroup in the country particularly near the Pakistani border. Some experts believe resources diverted toward the "surge" in Iraq have prevented the international force from adequately dealing with the threat in Afghanistan.

The Afghan government operates as under siege and in many ways it is with the countryside largely controlled by insurgents.

Attacks in eastern Afghanistan are up 40 percent from the same time last year.

Popular Posts