This is the first action since Obama took office on Tuesday that is likely to attract some opposition from progressive groups that supported him strongly during the campaign. Vanity Fair has this to say:
Obama can't be expected to pander to liberals for the next four years. But the decision to double down in Afghanistan carries considerable risk. Like the economy, it is a huge problem. But even the economy can be expected to bounce back sometime in the next few years. If Afghanistan turns into Obama's Iraq, he may miss the support of the anti-war left, which, it's worth remembering, helped propel him past Hillary Clinton not so very long ago.
![](http://nt1.ggpht.com/news?imgefp=CcWZYMQ1n-sJ&imgurl=www.latimes.com/media/photo/2009-01/pakistan_44675306.jpg)
Los Angeles Times
Strikes in Pakistan Underscore Obama’s Options
New York Times, United States -
Even as the CIA continues its strikes just inside Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan, Mr. Obama and his top national security aides are likely to review in ...
Suspected US missile attacks kill 18 in Pakistan
Suspected US Missile Strikes Kill at Least 20 in Pakistan
Deadly missiles strike Pakistan
![](http://nt2.ggpht.com/news?imgefp=mqsQL04KRRsJ&imgurl=www.welt.de/multimedia/archive/00739/eng_obama_GBS_BM_Ba_739597g.jpg)
WELT ONLINE
ANALYSIS: Obama, Pakistan and Afghanistan —Najmuddin A Shaikh
Daily Times, Pakistan -
The “hard earned peace” that Obama is seeking in Afghanistan (and Pakistan, since for some time now the American security establishment and many who are now ...
![](http://news.google.com/images/zippy_plus_sm.gif)
Afghan, Pakistani Officials Welcome Broader Strategy From US ...
Obama names Mideast, South Asia envoys
No comments:
Post a Comment